tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1354659632607599854.post8536682845666815830..comments2022-03-02T09:39:37.173+00:00Comments on Luke W. Faraone: Trip to SCOTUS, Camreta v. Greene (09-1454) or: "Justices just want tohave fun"Luke Faraonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11679092740238566479noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1354659632607599854.post-21991117203472752512011-03-28T07:10:47.000+00:002011-03-28T07:10:47.000+00:00The problem in the Greene cases is that Camreta di...The problem in the Greene cases is that Camreta didn't take SG to a CAC and have her interviewed instead he engaged on an abusive validation of his theory that Mr Greene was sexually abusing his daughters to the extent that what he did is a form of witness tampering. The problem is even though Oregon has written laws against that kind of behavior the courts have given him qualified immunity. The best that could happen is that the court could strip him of his immunity (for appealing against his immunity) and send it back-more likely though they'll dismiss the appeal for lack of a dispute. Even if the court vacated the ninth's reasoning he broke the rational given in the decision wrote for Doe v Heck where the court of appeals wrote a potential legal application for a similar WI law that would actually cover this case. The only evidence he had at the time was hearsay of hearsay which is insufficient even for reasonable suspicion.JMRnoreply@blogger.com